![]() "Sometimes it's helpful to have that third party who doesn't have a dog in that fight." "The good side of this, I think, is the court can be neutral," she said. Other states, including Connecticut, Nevada, North Dakota, Oklahoma and Texas, also treat the footage as public record, according to the NCSL.įootage that may be restricted in Ohio includes depictions of children, nudity, protected health information, crime prevention tactics, personal information or conversations not related to the law enforcement activity, information that could identify an alleged domestic violence or sexual abuse victim, and death - unless it was caused by an officer. ![]() In Ohio, police body camera footage is public record - with several stipulated exceptions - under a law that went into effect in 2019. ![]() However, that's been very uneven across the country," La Vigne said, noting that some states have lately tried to be "more prescriptive" over that release. Theoretically, you would think that that means that the footage that's captured on cameras would be released. "The original goal of body cameras was to enhance transparency. Generally, the statutes govern law enforcement's ability to withhold data and information, La Vigne said, considering factors such as whether an investigation is in progress, if consent is needed from innocent parties or victims captured on the footage or if the video needs to be redacted to protect those featured. "Some are really big sunshine states, others less so," she said.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |